CS Slider art - bigger

Asking Jesus in – Really?

I know I’m questioning the unquestionable, but… Is “Asking Jesus into our Hearts” Biblical? We have all heard it taught.  It is taught to children in Sunday schools, private Christian schools, and in Christian homes across the land.  It is taught as being the Gospel message, the plan of salvation, and in modern times it […]

Continue reading
first time

First Visit? Start Here!

If you are a professing Christian and this is your first visit to our site, this is where you want to start…

Continue reading
surprised

10 Christians that are Headed to Hell

Sound Crazy?  Maybe even offensive?  Don’t get angry just yet!  Instead, read this challenging article 

Continue reading
crossrd

A Christian gets Saved

Great video!  A “must watch”  for all who go by the name Christian! Check it out…

Continue reading

Science Can Never Define Reality – Scientific Evidence for Creation

(by Bruce Malone, used with permission)
America’s founders centered their discussions of almost every topic around what the Bible taught. Although not all were believing Christians, they did recognize the unique authority of the Bible. One study conducted by the University of Houston found that 92% of all important quotes by America’s Founding Fathers from 1750 to 1790 were either direct or indirect references to Biblical teachings.1
Today, if a person were to state that his viewpoint was based on Biblical teaching, he would be met with either a blank stare or open ridicule. America’s culture is post-Christian in nature because Christianity is no longer the primary influencing philosophy. The belief that science can define reality has replaced Christianity as the primary source of truth. Continue reading

Magic, Science, and Great Mysteries – Scientific Evidence for Creation

(by Bruce Malone, used with permission)
The best kept secret of a magician is to get the observer to eliminate the obvious while focusing on the illusion. For instance, the magician will display empty hands or an ordinary scarf before putting something back into his hand (which you assume is still empty) or switching to a trick scarf (which you assume is still ordinary). His skill as a magician depends upon getting the observer to disregard the correct answer so that the mystery remains. Believers in evolution use the same method as they present students with only the natural possibilities for the appearance and advancement of life, while hiding the evidence for creation.
Magazines occasionally publish lists of “great mysteries.” U.S. News and World Report devoted the cover story of the 8/18/97 issue to 18 “Great Science Mysteries”. Yet, most of these mysteries simply disappear if we assume the Bible is true. They are only mysteries if the correct answer has been eliminated before starting the investigation. Continue reading

Education: Redefined – Scientific Evidence for Creation

(by Bruce Malone, used with permission)
The goal of public education should be training children to think, reason, and discover truth. Yet, the methods used by our education system seem more directed toward molding young minds in such a way as to guarantee agreement with the majority opinion. This teaching method is most apparent when it comes to evolution.
Whenever there is even the slightest hint of criticism or opposition to the naturalistic evolution found in our textbooks, schools, or museums, the charge of bringing religion into public schools is leveled against concerned parents. Continue reading

Science Defined to Exclude Creation – Scientific Evidence for Creation

(by Bruce Malone, used with permission)

The following strategy is repeatedly used by those who advocate “evolution only” education. They:
1. Define science to exclude the possibility of a creator.
2. Claim that all the evidence for our designer is “not science” and, therefore cannot be shown.
3. Repeat, like a mantra, statements such as “evolution is the basis of science” and imply that
microbes-to-man evolution is a proven fact.
4. Then give examples of minor changes within organisms as “proof” that one organism can change into a completely different type, while using the same word, ‘evolution’ for both the small and the enormous changes.
Actual scientific evidence for any major evolutionary transformation is non-existent. Continue reading

Transitional Forms of Life – Scientific Evidence for Creation

(by Bruce Malone, used with permission)
Believers in evolution claim that the fossil record is filled with transitional forms of life that prove one form of life turned into another over vast periods of time. Those who acknowledge the evidence that we have an intelligent designer claim that there are no transitional fossils showing how one animal turned into another. Both groups have the same rocks, fossils, and data, so why do they come to such different conclusions? And how can the non-scientist know who is correct? Continue reading

Battling Sin

As a Christian, if you aren’t battling the sin in your life there’s a good chance you aren’t a Christian.  sounds harsh, doesn’t it?  But it’s the truth.  After sinning, a true believer finds the same sin they lusted for only moments before to be abhorrent and repulsive.  This is a natural consequence of having been made a new creation and filled with the Spirit of the pure and holy God.  Tim Challies is doing a series on sin in the life of a Christian, and it’s worth taking some time to read. Below is an excerpt from the latest post and a link to read the whole article.  We highly encourage you to check it out!

To become a Christian is to accept the lifelong challenge of becoming who you are — of putting sin to death and growing in holiness. Today I want to channel a little John Owen and tell you three things you ought to expect when battling sin.

Expect that the Battle Will Be Long

Owen says that putting sin to death consists of “a habitual weakening of sin,” and I take this to mean that over time and through our habits we chip away at our sin bit-by-bit and day-by-day. Rather than expecting sin to be destroyed in a moment, we expect that it will take time and focused effort. In this way putting sin to death is relative to our maturity as Christians and to the amount of time we have dedicated to battling a particular sin. He says, “The first thing in mortification is the weakening of this habit of sin or lust, that it shall not, with that violence, earnestness, frequency, rise up, conceive, tumultuate, provoke, entice, disquiet as naturally as it is apt to do.”

He has this amazing quote that is quite an indictment of humanity: “The reason why a natural man is not always perpetually in the pursuit of some one lust, night and day, is because he has many to serve, every one crying to be satisfied; thence he is carried on with great variety, but still in general he lies toward the satisfaction of self.”

He also makes a very helpful comparison between putting sin to death and a man being executed on a cross:

As a man nailed to the cross he first struggles and strives and cries out with great strength and might, but, as his blood and spirits waste, his strivings are faint and seldom, his cries low and hoarse, scarce to be heard; when a man first sets on a lust or distemper, to deal with it, it struggles with great violence to break loose; it cries with earnestness and impatience to be satisfied and relieved; but when by mortification the blood and spirits of it are let out, it moves seldom and faintly, cries sparingly, and is scarce heard in the heart; it may have sometimes a dying pang, that makes an appearance of great vigor and strength, but it is quickly over, especially if it be kept from considerable success.

Expect that the Battle Will Be Hard

Putting sin to death is a long and violent struggle against a deadly enemy that is absolutely devoted to our destruction. In this way we should not expect that putting sin to death will be easy, and we should not expect that sin will go quietly. “When sin is strong and vigorous, the soul is scarce able to make any head against it; it sighs, and groans, and mourns, and is troubled, as David speaks of himself, but seldom has sin in the pursuit.” This will be a lifelong battle and one that requires constant attention.

To fight against sin you need to know that…

Continue reading!  Follow this link to the original articleCLICK HERE

Dinosaur Discoveries Rock Evolution – Scientific Evidence for Creation

(by Bruce Malone, used with permission)
Only seven Tyrannosaurus Rex specimens have been found that are more than 50% complete. Because these fossils are assumed to be over 60 million years old, evolution believers have historically failed to look for unfossilized material within the bones. Dinosaur bones are generally found in a fossilized condition with silica and other minerals having completely replaced the carbon structure of the original bones — although bones with the appearance of recent burial have been documented.1 Fossilization is a well understood process that can take place very rapidly under proper conditions. There are many documented cases of the rapid fossilization of organic matter in silica rich water exposure.2
Yet, a recent T. Rex discovery sent shockwaves through the scientific community. Evolution believer, Mary H. Schweitzer, of North Carolina State University has discovered flexible blood vessels inside the fossilized bones of a “68-70 million year old” T. Rex from the Hell Creek formation in eastern Montana.3 Continue reading

Noah’s Ark Was No Little Boat – Scientific Evidence for Creation

(by Bruce Malone, used with permission)
If “Noah’s Ark” is found, it will be the greatest archeological discovery of all time. Finding an ancient wooden sea vessel, buried high on Mt. Ararat, large enough to hold two of every basic kind of land dwelling animal, would have the following implications:
- It would supplement and reinforce confidence in the geological evidence that the entire surface of our planet had been covered by water within the last 4500 years.
- It would provide an additional factual basis for the flood legends which are present within the oral history of almost every human culture.
- It would again confirm the reliability of the early Biblical record of the human race.
- It would support the Biblical model that every land animal has descended from those animals taken on the ark, and human descent from the humans on the ark.

Continue reading

Ape or Man, but no Apeman – Scientific Evidence for Creation

(by Bruce Malone, used with permission)
Charts showing a progression from ape-like creature to man are extremely common and leave readers with the impression that the search for man’s ancestors is essentially finished. These types of charts seldom acknowledge the massive body of evidence that reveals discrepancies and outright fraud which has accompanied the search for man’s ancestry. It is beyond the scope of this article to refute each of the supposed fossil fragments in the ancestral line leading to man, but a few will be highlighted. For a balanced view of the evidence concerning our origin read “Bones of Contention, A Creationist Assessment of Human Fossils“, by Martin Lubenow. It is a well documented assessment of all the fossils Continue reading

Are Birds Really Dinosaurs? – Scientific Evidence for Creation

(by Bruce Malone, used with permission)
From magazines to newspapers… from museums to textbooks… the concept that dinosaurs turned into birds is presented as fact. Yet, this concept, like all the other supposed “facts” of evolution, is wrought with problems which are seldom exposed. Whenever dinosaurs with a bone structure remotely similar to birds are found, the link between dinosaurs and birds is assumed to exist. Bird fossils such as Archaeopteryx are presented as proof of evolution because the bones have some characteristics reminiscent of reptiles. Yet this whole idea of dinosaurs turning into birds is based more on faith than scientific fact. Here are a few observations which are seldom reported: Continue reading

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 43 other followers